Neurodiversity
From Halbeeg, the open encyclopedia · Af-Soomaali
44 languages
Neurodiversity is a concept stating that variations in how the brain works—including learning, communication, attention, and emotion—are a normal part of human diversity, not simply a disorder or deficit to be corrected. The term combines scientific description with a political stance arguing that environment and social systems should be adapted to accommodate people with different neurological profiles.
The concept is commonly associated with conditions such as autism, ADHD (attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder), dyslexia (reading difficulty), dyscalculia, dyspraxia, and Tourette syndrome. Advocacy groups use the term to convey that such individuals have a different mode of brain function, often with particular strengths, and have specific support needs.
Origins of the term
The English term 'neurodiversity' emerged in the 1990s, a period when autism advocacy movements—particularly internet-based communities—argued that autism should be understood as neurological difference rather than solely as disease. The term's history is often attributed to the writings of Judy Singer and other scholars of that era, though the precise origin remains debated.
The social model and the medical model
Neurodiversity rests on a distinction between two frameworks. The medical model emphasizes individual deficits requiring treatment. The social model argues that most barriers arise from how environments, schools, and workplaces are designed. Under the social model, solutions involve changing systems—for example, allowing extended time on exams, quieter work environments, or individualized learning plans.
Use and debate
The term is used in schools, workplaces, and disability rights policy. Some companies have launched hiring programs that highlight particular skills. Conversely, debate exists: some parents and clinicians caution that the neurodiversity framework may understate the importance of care and support for those with high support needs, including those requiring daily assistance. Others argue that both approaches can coexist: recognizing neurological difference and providing treatment and support when needed.